艾灸跟失智|艾灸對認知障礙的療效:系統回顧與動物實驗的整合分析
本系統回顧探討艾灸對動物模型中認知障礙的影響,研究結果顯示其改善了認知測試成績並揭示了氧化壓力抑制與血管內皮生長因子 (VEGF) 提升等機制,未來需更多研究進一步驗證。
隨著人口老化,認知障礙成為越來越普遍的慢性病,影響全球數百萬人。現行的認知障礙治療主要是緩解症狀,但伴隨不良藥物反應的風險。本研究探討 艾灸 作為治療認知障礙的潛力,分析其在動物實驗中的成效。結果顯示,艾灸療法不僅改善了認知功能測試,還可能透過抑制氧化壓力和增加血管內皮生長因子 (VEGF) 來發揮作用。然而,更多的詳細研究仍是必要的。
本研究綜合了16篇針對艾灸對認知障礙效果的動物實驗研究,涉及324隻動物模型,範圍涵蓋阿茲海默症和血管性癡呆等類型的認知障礙。研究從多個數據庫檢索,篩選出符合隨機對照條件且專注於單一艾灸療法的實驗。研究結果分為行為測試和免疫組化指標兩大類,並依照 CAMARADES 標準進行偏誤風險評估。
行為測試結果:艾灸在認知改善的具體效果
本研究中,行為測試主要包括 莫里斯水迷宮 (Morris Water Maze) 測試和 步降測試 (Step-Down Test)。在水迷宮測試中,艾灸組顯著縮短了逃逸時間並增加了跨越次數,顯示其有助於提升學習記憶能力。在步降測試中,艾灸組也顯著延長潛伏期並減少錯誤次數,進一步支持艾灸在改善神經行為上的潛力。
抑制氧化壓力與減少凋亡的機制
研究發現,艾灸可能透過抑制氧化壓力來改善認知功能。多項研究顯示,艾灸能夠增加抗氧化酶 (如超氧化物歧化酶 SOD 和谷胱甘肽過氧化酶 GSH-Px) 的表現,同時減少促氧化指標 (如丙二醛 MDA) 的濃度。除此之外,艾灸還顯著減少了 Bcl-2 相關的促凋亡蛋白 (如 Bax) 表現,顯示其在降低神經細胞凋亡方面的潛力。
認知障礙中常見的炎症反應,如膠質纖維酸性蛋白 (GFAP) 水平升高和細胞因子 (IL-1β 和 TNF-α) 的活化,被認為與疾病進展有密切關聯。艾灸治療顯示可以降低促炎因子的表現水平,例如在三項研究中,艾灸治療降低了 GFAP、IL-1β 和 TNF-α 的濃度。此外,艾灸還顯著減少了 β-澱粉樣蛋白 (Aβ) 的生成和積聚,從而延緩阿茲海默症的進展。
促進血管內皮生長因子 (VEGF) 的生成與血管修復
艾灸對血管健康也可能有正面作用。兩項研究顯示艾灸顯著提升了 VEGF 和相關因子的表現,進而促進血管內皮細胞的增生與遷移,對因缺血引起的記憶喪失可能具有修復效果。這表明艾灸對血管性癡呆患者的潛在治療效果值得進一步探討。
艾灸可能透過調節三羧酸 (TCA) 循環及脂肪酸代謝產物來支持能量代謝,改善認知功能障礙。在 TCA 循環中,能量代謝的損失被認為是阿茲海默症進展的關鍵之一,而脂質代謝異常則可能促進神經損傷。艾灸調節這些代謝途徑的作用,顯示其在維持神經健康和減緩認知退化方面的潛力。
結論:艾灸在認知障礙治療中的潛力與限制
本研究的系統回顧顯示,艾灸對於認知障礙有顯著的療效,其機制可能包含抑制氧化壓力、減少凋亡、調節炎症反應、促進 VEGF 表現和代謝調節等。儘管如此,該研究也指出了實驗數量少、偏誤風險高、報告質量低等限制,未來仍需更多樣本的大型實驗來驗證艾灸的療效,並深入探討其作用機制。
Integr Med Res. 2020 Oct 14;10(2):100680. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100680
Moxibustion for cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies
Sungmin Aum a, Seon Choe b, Mudan Cai c, Ui Min Jerng d,⁎, Jun-Hwan Lee c,⁎
Author information
Article notes
Copyright and License information
PMCID: PMC7972968 PMID: 33747784
Abstract
Background
Cognitive impairment is an age-dependent chronic disorder that exponentially worsens with age; however, its treatment is mostly symptomatic. Moxibustion is widely accepted in East Asia as a treatment for cognitive impairment. This systematic review aimed to verify the efficacy and underlying mechanism of moxibustion in treating cognitive impairment.
Methods
Sixteen trials involving 324 animals obtained from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan-Fang, Cqvip, the Korean Studies Information Service System, and the Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System met the inclusion criteria. We extracted the results of behavioral tests and immunohistochemical biomarkers from the included articles and evaluated the risk of bias and reporting quality.
Results
The moxibustion group showed significantly decreased escape latency, increased crossing times, and prolonged dwelling times in the Morris water maze test. There was a significantly enhanced latency period and reduced error time in the step-down test and nerve behavior score. The effects of moxibustion were found to be mediated by suppression of oxidative stress and apoptosis, modulation of inflammation and Aβ genesis activation of vascular endothelial growth factor, and adjustment of metabolites in the tricarboxylic acid cycle and fatty acid metabolism.
Conclusion
Our results demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of moxibustion on cognitive impairment and suggested the putative mechanism. However, considering the small number of included studies, high bias risk, low reporting quality, and the limitations of animal experimentation, our results need to be confirmed by more detailed studies.
Keywords: Animal experimentation, Cognitive impairment, Dementia, Moxibustion, Systematic review
1. Introduction
Cognitive impairment is an age-dependent chronic disorder1; globally, the number of patients is expected to reach 82 million in 2030 and 152 million in 2050.2 Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common type of cognitive impairment,3 accounting for 60–80% of all cases,2,4 which is characterized by the accumulation of Aβ peptides, senile plaques, and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFT), related to neuronal damage and premature neuronal death.4 Vascular dementia (VD) is the second most common type of cognitive impairment, which is driven by complex factors reducing cerebral blood flow and causing oxidative stress, resulting in cerebral ischemia.5
Despite the growing need for proper management of cognitive impairment in aging societies, the available therapeutic options are still mostly symptomatic, providing short-term benefit for specific condition, with a risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs).6
Moxibustion is a widely used therapy in Eastern Asia for more than 2500 years.7,8 Moxibustion entails stimulating acupoints on the body by burning herb leaves directly (attaching moxa cones to the skin) or indirectly (interposing a substance such as ginger between the moxa cones and the skin) to transmit heat stimulation8,9 and induce pharmacological action via herbal components.10,11
In addition to its wide range of use for pain relief12,13 and inflammation control,14,15 moxibustion has been recognized as a suitable treatment for cognitive impairment, with several recent studies indicating its efficacy in patients with dementia.16,17
Acupuncture, another representative traditional Chinese medicine treatment, has been reported to be effective in cognitive enhancement, with supporting evidence from several systematic reviews (SRs),18,19,20 suggesting that its potential mechanism involves suppression of oxidative stress and neuroinflammation and modulation of glucose metabolism5 and neuronal signaling pathways.21
However, compared with acupuncture studies, the therapeutic efficacy of moxibustion for cognitive impairment has not been fully validated. Although a previous study has reported the action of moxibustion in preventing cognitive impairment,22 information on the overall therapeutic effect of moxibustion was limited, as it was focused on prevention. This SR aimed to evaluate the efficacy of moxibustion in treating cognitive impairment through a meta-analysis of animal studies. We also examined the underlying mechanisms and the quality of the supporting evidence.
2. Methods
2.1. Study search and selection
We used search terms consisting of variants of “cognitive impairment” for the target disease, “moxibustion” for the intervention, and “animal study.” The following databases were searched: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane library (English language); the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan-Fang, and Cqvip Database (Chinese language); the Korean Studies Information Service System and Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (Korean language). We searched studies published from the time of inception of each database to January 2019.
2.2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria
We included animal studies that conducted randomized controlled trials on moxibustion as an intervention for cognitive disorders. We did not discriminate between different types of cognitive impairment including AD and VD. The search terms we used for describing cognitive impairment are provided in Supplementary material. All rodent models developed for any type of cognitive impairment were included.
Although we included all types of moxibustion, we excluded studies that used combined treatments. Furthermore, in the control group, we only included studies that used cognitively impaired animals without any interventions. Regarding outcome measurements, we included results from behavioral tests, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopic analyses.
Two reviewers (SMA and SC) independently selected and evaluated the studies and subsequently discussed for confirmation. Conflicts were resolved by consulting a third reviewer (UMJ) to reach a consensus. We used the eligible studies to extract data in a standardized form suitable for animal study design as follows: study design, research institute, methodological details, procedure compatibility (performing of randomization and blinding), and therapeutic characteristics of moxibustion. Regarding measurement outcomes, we defined the primary outcomes as behavioral test results and the secondary outcomes as immunohistochemical results. For studies where data was only graphically presented, we attempted to contact the corresponding author; if unsuccessful, we extracted the data by scaling the graph using the GetData graph digitizer version 2.26.0.20 (copyright 2001–2013; S. Fedorov). Details of the included studies are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the included studies in animal model and treatment.
Study
Animal model
Treatment
Species
Age (months)
Weight (g)
Sample size
Target Disease
Acupoints
Moxa diameter (mm)
Duration (min)
Treatment period
Moxa (M, F)
Control (M, F)
Du 26
Wistar rat
12
500 ± 20
(10,0)
(10,0)
AD
GV20, BL23
6
15
14 times for 14 days
Liu 33
ApoE(−/−) mice
2
27 ∼ 29
(11,0)
(11,0)
AD
CV8
20∼30
20
72 times for 78 days
Wang 27
SD rat
15
350 ∼450
(10,0)
(10,0)
AD
GV20, BL23, ST36
NR
5
18 times for 21 days
Wang 28
SD rat
15
350 ∼450
(10,0)
(10,0)
AD
GV20, BL23, ST36
8
5
18 times for 21 days
Wang 29
SD rat
15
350 ∼450
(10,0)
(10,0)
AD
GV20, BL23, ST36
NR
5
18 times for 21 days
Jiang 31
SD rat
2
300 ± 30
(11,0)
(10,0)
AD
GV20, GV4, GV1, CV4
10
3 or 7*
10 times for 30 days
Wang 34
Wistar rat
NR
300 ± 30
(12,0)
(12,0)
VD
GV20, GV24, GV14
NR
20
30 times for 31 days
Wang 37
Wistar rat
10
300 ± 30
(12,0)
(12,0)
VD
GV20, GV24, GV14
2∼3
20
30 times for 31 days
Zhu 30
SD rat
NR
NR
(12,0)
(12,0)
AD
GV20, GV16, GV14
20
20
15 times for 15 days
Wang 35
SD rat
NR
250 ± 10
(7.0)
(7,0)
VD
GV20, GV24, GV14
5
20
30 times for 30 days
Weilan38
Wistar rat
NR
220 ± 20
(7,0)
(7,0)
VD
GV20, GV16, ST36, GB20
NR
3 Zhuang
24 times for 27 days
Luo 40
Wistar rat
NR
280 ± 20
(10,0)
(10,0)
VD
CV6, CV12, CV17, SP10, TE5, ST36
5
3 or 4 Zhuang
24 times for 27 days
Zhang 36
Wistar rat
10
250 ± 50
(8,0)
(8,0)
VD
GV20, GV24, GV14
15
20
30 times for 31 days
Xiao 7
SD rat
2
350 ∼400
(10,0)
(10,0)
AD
KI6, TE5, GB41, PC6, SP4, SI3, BL62, LU7
NR
9 Zhuang
35 times for 35 days
Yu 32
APP/PS1mice
6
NR
(12.0)
(12,0)
AD
CV4
20
15
48 times for 55 days
Zhu 39
SD rat
NR
200 ∼250
(10,0)
(10,0)
VD
GV14, GV4, CV4
NR
15
24 times for 27 days
Abbreviations: SDS, prague-Dawley; ApoE−/−, apolipoprotein E-deficient; APP/PS1, Amyloid precursor protein/presenilin-1 transgenic; M, male; F, female; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; DB, database; VD, vascular dementia; NR, not reported; NA, not applicable.
*Jiang31 treated all participants using moxibustion for 3 min except GV20 which received moxibustion for 7 min.
2.3. Study assessment and analysis
We evaluated the overall potential bias in the included studies based on the Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies (CAMARADES) study quality checklist,23 as suggested by CAMARADES24 for reporting animal data from experimental studies. The reporting quality of each study was evaluated according to the Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines checklist.25
In the behavioral test, decreased escape latency in the Morris water maze (MWM) test suggests restored cognitive function, which is indicated by faster learning, maintaining a better score on average, and achieving a superior final score; meanwhile, increased cross and dwelling times from the target probe test suggest prolonged memory. Assessment of the step-down test results and neuronal behavior scores indicated a beneficial effect in extending the latency period and shortening error times.
The results of behavioral tests obtained by means and standard errors were synthesized, and meta-analyses were conducted using a random effect model, the RevMan version 5.3 (released on June 13, 2014, Cochrane Collaboration).
3. Results
3.1. Characteristics of included studies
3.1.1. Study screening
Based on our electronic search criteria, we retrieved 3474 articles. After removing duplicate studies, the titles and abstracts of 3109 studies were screened and 296 articles were selected for in-depth screening of the full text. Finally, 16 original articles met our inclusion criteria, of which five could be quantitatively synthesized. Among the 16 articles, two were dissertations not published in peer-review journals. A diagram of the study selection process is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
PRISMA flow diagram for selecting related studies.
3.1.2. Fundamental study characteristics: animals
The 16 original research studies included in our analysis used a total of 324 rats and mice (age: 2–15 months; weight: 200–520 g [rats], 27–29 g [mice]). Nine studies established an AD model; among them, four studies injected Aβ (Aβ1–4226 or Aβ25–3527, 28, 29), three studies injected chemical toxin (d-galactose7,30 or streptozotocin31) into the hippocampus, and two studies established transgenic mice (amyloid precursor protein [APP]/presenilin 1 [PS1]), double-transgenic mice,32 or apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE−/−) mice.33 Seven studies established VD models by performing four-vessel occlusion,34, 35, 36 bilateral carotid artery occlusion,37, 38, 39 or autologous blood injection.40 The characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1.
3.1.3. Fundamental study characteristics: moxibustion
The most frequently used acupoint was GV20 (11 studies), followed by GV14 (6 studies), ST36 (5 studies), then GV24 and BL23 (4 studies; Supplementary material). The extra acupoints selected for treatment are described in Supplementary material. Indirect moxibustion was used in most of the studies, except for two studies where direct moxibustion was performed.38,40 Among those that used indirect moxibustion, eight burned the moxibustion about 2–3 cm above the surface of the acupoints, four placed a moxibustion cone on the skin and burned it, and two stimulated the acupoints by dropping ashes of thread soaked in herb medicine on the acupoints. The total treatment period ranged from 2 to 11 weeks, and the most frequently set time was 4 weeks (9 studies).
3.2. Quality assessment of the included studies
3.2.1. Risk of bias
Based on the checklist for evaluating the risk of bias, on average about 5.3 criteria were satisfied by the included studies (Table 2). All studies reported the implementation of randomization and possible conflicts of interest. However, no study reported the blinding process of allocation and only one study performed the blinded assessment of outcome.
Table 2.
Risk of bias in the included studies evaluated by the CAMARADES’ study quality checklist.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
Total count of Y
Du 26
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Nn
Y
N
Y
Y
6
Liu 33
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Nn
Y
N
N
Y
6
Wang 27
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Nn
Y
N
N
Y
5
Wang 28
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Nk
Y
N
Y
Y
6
Wang 29
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Nk
Y
N
Y
Y
6
Jiang31
Y
N
Y
N
N
Nk
Y
N
N
Y
4
Wang 34
Y
N
Y
N
N
Nk
Y
N
N
Y
4
Wang 37
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Nk
Y
N
Y
Y
6
Zhu 30
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Nn
Y
N
N
Y
6
Wang 35
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Nn
Y
N
Y
Y
6
Weilan38
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Nk
Y
N
Y
Y
6
Luo 40
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Nk
Y
N
N
Y
5
Zhang 36
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Nk
Y
N
N
Y
5
Xiao 7
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Nn
Y
N
N
Y
5
Yu 32
N
Y
Y
N
N
Nn
Y
N
N
Y
4
Zhu 39
N
Y
Y
N
N
Nk
Y
N
Y
Y
5
Total count of Y
14
14
16
0
1
0
16
0
7
16
(1) Publication in peer-reviewed journal (2) Statement of control of temperature (3) Randomization of treatment or control (4) Allocation concealment (5) Blinded assessment of outcome (6) Avoidance of anesthetics with marked intrinsic properties (7) Use of a suitable animal model (8) Sample size calculation (9) Statement of compliance with regulatory requirements (10) Statement regarding possible conflict of interest.
Y, Yes; N, No; Nn, Not necessary; Nk, Not known.
3.2.2. Reporting quality
Regarding the ARRIVE guidelines (Table 3), all studies fully presented four items, including the title, objectives, sample size per group, and funding. Regarding the experimental procedure, although most studies detailed “how it was conducted,” only four studies mentioned “why it was conducted.” Although all studies reported the sample size, the method and reference of sample calculation were not reported, and the assessment regarding the statistical approach was not properly disclosed.
Table 3.
Reporting quality assessment of the treatment studies based upon the ARRIVE guidelines.
Study
ARRIVE Guideline
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Title
Abstract
Back ground
Objec tives
Ethical statement
Study design
Experimental procedure
Experimental animals
Housing/ husbandry
Sample size
Allocating animals to experimental groups
Experimental outcomes
Statistical methods
Baseline data
Numbers analyzed
Outcomes and estimation
Adverse events
Interpretation/scientific implications
Generalizability / Translation
Funding
a
b
a
b
c
a
b
c
d
a
b
a
b
c
a
b
c
a
b
a
b
c
a
b
a
b
a
b
c
Du 26
F
P
F
F
F
F
F
P
P
F
P
P
N
F
P
F
F
N
F
N
NA
P
N
F
P
F
N
P
F
NA
F
N
N
F
F
P
F
F
Liu 33
F
P
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
N
F
N
NA
F
N
F
F
F
N
P
F
P
P
N
N
F
F
N
F
F
Wang 27
F
P
P
P
F
N
F
F
P
F
P
F
N
F
F
P
P
N
F
N
NA
P
N
F
P
F
N
F
F
NA
F
N
N
F
N
N
P
F
Wang 28
F
P
P
P
F
N
F
F
P
F
F
F
N
F
F
N
N
N
F
N
NA
P
N
F
P
F
N
P
F
NA
F
N
N
F
N
N
P
F
Wang 29
F
P
P
P
F
F
F
P
P
F
F
F
F
F
F
P
P
N
F
N
NA
P
N
F
F
F
N
F
F
F
F
N
N
F
N
N
P
F
Jiang31
F
P
P
P
F
F
F
F
P
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
P
P
F
N
NA
P
N
F
F
F
N
N
F
F
F
N
N
F
N
N
P
F
Wang 34
F
P
F
P
F
N
F
P
F
F
F
F
P
F
F
F
P
P
F
N
NA
F
N
F
F
F
N
N
F
F
F
N
N
P
N
N
P
F
Wang 37
F
P
F
P
F
N
F
F
F
F
F
F
N
F
F
F
P
P
F
N
NA
F
N
F
F
F
N
N
F
F
F
N
N
P
N
N
N
F
Zhu 30
F
P
F
P
F
F
F
P
F
F
F
F
N
P
F
P
P
N
F
N
NA
F
N
F
F
F
N
P
F
F
F
N
N
F
N
N
N
F
Wang 35
F
P
F
P
F
N
F
P
F
F
F
F
N
F
F
F
N
N
F
F
NA
F
N
F
NA
F
N
P
F
F
F
N
N
F
N
N
N
F
Weilan38
F
P
F
P
F
F
F
P
F
F
F
F
N
F
F
F
F
P
F
N
NA
F
N
F
F
F
N
P
F
F
F
N
N
F
N
N
P
F
Luo 40
F
P
F
P
F
N
F
F
F
F
F
F
N
F
F
F
F
P
F
N
NA
F
N
F
F
F
N
F
F
F
F
N
N
F
P
N
P
F
Zhang 36
F
P
F
P
F
N
F
F
F
F
F
F
N
F
F
F
P
P
F
N
NA
F
N
F
F
F
N
F
F
F
F
N
N
F
P
N
P
F
Xiao 7
F
P
F
P
F
N
F
P
F
F
F
F
N
F
F
P
F
P
F
N
NA
F
N
F
F
F
N
P
F
F
F
N
N
F
F
N
P
F
Yu 32
F
F
F
P
F
N
F
F
F
F
F
F
N
F
F
P
F
N
F
N
NA
F
N
F
F
F
N
P
F
NA
F
N
N
F
F
N
P
F
Zhu 39
F
F
F
P
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
N
F
F
P
F
N
F
N
NA
F
N
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
N
N
F
F
N
P
F
Abbreviations: ARRIVE, Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments; F, fully reported; P, partially reported; N, not reported; NA, not applicable.
3.2.3. Data acquisition for analysis
Regarding the analysis of the behavioral test results, we excluded studies that reported duplicated data29 or omitted detailed values33 from the outcome analysis. Furthermore, studies reporting graph-shaped results33,35,41,42 were scaled by the GetData graph digitizer program, and the means and standard deviations were extracted.
3.3. Outcome analysis of the included studies
3.3.1. Results of primary outcome: behavioral experiments
Among the studies that performed behavioral tests, those with duplicated29 and insufficient data33 were excluded, whereas results presented in the form of graphs33,35,41,42 were converted to numerical values. Consequently, we obtained results from 11 behavioral tests and finally included five studies that performed the MWM test and two that performed the step-down and nerve behavioral tests for analysis.
3.2.2. Morris water maze test
Among the nine studies that performed MWM tests, five26,30,31,36,40 that reported the individual results for MWM tests conducted for 4 days were included in the meta-analysis. Regarding escape latencies, the moxibustion group showed a significantly decreased escape latency compared to the control group after analysis of results measured from days 1 to 4 (Fig. 2). Additionally, from the 1st to the 3rd day, there was a decreasing tendency of the SMD of escape time (1st day: SMD: −1.97; 95% CI: −3.54, −0.40; p = 0.01, I2 = 90%; 2nd day: SMD: −3.19; 95% CI: −5.32, −1.06; p < 0.001, I2 = 93%; 3rd day: SMD: −4.51; 95% CI: −7.07, −1.96; p < 0.001, I2 = 93%). The greatest difference in the SMD between the moxibustion and control group was observed on the 3rd day.
Fig. 2.
Forest plot of escape latency in the Morris water maze test from the 1st to 4th day.
Regarding platform crossing times, the moxibustion group presented significantly increased crossing times compared to the control group (SMD: 4.19; 95% CI: 1.98, 6.40; p < 0.001; Fig. 3A). The dwelling time was reported in four different formats as follows: time spent in the quadrant,43,44,45 percentage of time dwelling,30,33,41,42 percentage of total distance traveled within the quadrant,46 and picture tracking of the animal’s motion.27,31 Meta-analysis indicated a significantly increased dwelling time in the quadrant in the moxibustion group compared with that in the control group (SMD: 2.49; 95% CI: −0.10, 5.07; p < 0.001); however, the heterogeneity remained high (I2 = 93%). Three studies,27,31,46 albeit not included in the meta-analysis, showed significantly decreased distance within the quadrant where animals in the moxibustion group traveled.
Fig. 3.
Forest plot of (A) cross times and dwelling time in the Morris water maze test (B) latency period and error times in the step-down test. (C) nerve behavior score.
3.2.3. Step-down test
Among the three studies that performed step-down tests, two studies34,37 reporting same methods were meta-analyzed and showed significantly extended latent periods (SMD: 2.93; 95% CI: 2.03, 3.83; p < 0.001; Fig. 3B (A)) and shortened error times (SMD: −2.50; 95% CI: −3.70, −1.31; p < 0.001; Fig. 3B (B)) in the moxibustion group.
In another study,33 the moxibustion group showed significantly prolonged latency and decreased error counts in both training and retention stages.
3.2.4. Nerve behavior score
Two of the studies34,37 that conducted step-down tests also determined nerve behavior scores. The results were scored by a five-point scale in reference to a previous study47 Consequently, we found significantly decreased nerve behavior scores in the moxibustion group compared with the control group (SMD: −2.09; 95% CI: −2.82, −1.36; p < 0.001; Fig. 3C).
3.2.5. Results of the secondary outcome: putative immunohistochemical biomarkers
Fourteen of the included studies investigated various immunohistochemical biomarkers for pathogenic characteristics (Table 4 and Fig. 4).
Table 4.
Outcomes evaluated in the included studies.
Study
Outcome
Signal pathway
Behavioral test
Du 26
1. Morris water maze a) Escape latency b) Crossing times c) Dwelling time
Apoptosis rates ↓
Liu 33
1. Morris water maze c) Dwelling time
GFAP ↓, Aβ ↓
Wang 27
1. Morris water maze a) Escape latency b) Crossing times
Bcl-2 ↑, Bax ↓, Caspase-3 ↓
Wang 28
None
Aβ ↓
Wang 29
Duplicated with Wang 27
Morphologic change
Jiang 31
1. Morris water maze b) Crossing times
IL-1β ↓, IL-2 ↑, Aβ ↓
Wang 34
2. Step-down test a) Latent period b) Error times 3. Nerve behavior score
VEGF ↑, flt-1 ↑, flk-1mRNA ↑
Wang 37
2. Step-down test a) Latent period b) Error times 3. Nerve behavior score
VEGF ↑, flt-1 ↑, bFGF ↑, bFGF-r ↑
Zhu 30
1. Morris water maze a) Escape latency b) Crossing times c) Dwelling time
PS1 ↓, BACE-1 ↓, serum IL-6 ↓, Aβ ↓
Wang 35
None
morphologic change
Weilan 38
NA
Bax ↓, Bcl-2 ↑, C-fos ↓
Luo 40
1. Morris water maze a) Escape latency b) Crossing times
NA
Zhang 36
NA
Vascular endothelial cell proliferation↑, migration↑
Xiao 7
1. Morris water maze a) Escape latency
Bax ↓, Bcl-2 ↑, SOD2 ↑, MDA ↓, GSH-Px ↑ ChAT ↑, AChE ↓
Yu 32
NA
Metabolites of TCA ↑ Metabolites of fatty acid ↓ Mono / polyunsaturated fatty acids ↑
Zhu 39
1. Morris water maze a) Escape latency
NF-κB (NF-κBp65, NFκBp50) ↓, TNF-α ↓, IL-1β ↓, morphologic change
Abbreviations: TCA, tricarboxylic acid; FA, fatty acid; P-p38 MAPK, phospho-p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase; Aβ, β-amyloid; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; IL, interleukin; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; Flt-1, fms-like tyrosine kinase 1; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma 2; Bax, Bcl-2-associated X protein; SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; BACE-1, β-site APP cleaving enzyme 1; PS1, presenilin-1; APP, Amyloid precursor protein; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; AChE, acetylcholinesterase; ChAT, choline acetyltransferase; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; NF- kB, nuclear factor-kappa.
Fig. 4.
Putative mechanisms underlying cognitive impairment. The mechanisms identified in the figure represent those that could be modulated by moxibustion based on the reviewed studies.
Liu et al33 reported decreased levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), whereas three studies30,31,39 verified attenuated inflammatory damage after moxibustion treatment. Three studies7,27,38 demonstrated apoptosis-related factors that were controlled after moxibustion treatment; they also reported the upregulation of B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) and downregulation of Bcl-2–associated X protein (Bax). The morphological changes of neuronal cells in the control group were compared with those of the moxibustion group,29,30 and recovery of morphological characteristics of neuronal cells was observed in the moxibustion group. Four studies28,30,31,33,41 investigated Aβ genesis and found it to be significantly restrained in the moxibustion group, with Zhu et al30 reporting decreased levels of PS1 and β-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE-1) in the moxibustion group, indicating the efficacy of moxibustion in regulating Aβ genesis.
Two studies34,37 found that moxibustion improved VEGF levels and related factors. Furthermore, Zhang et al36 postulated that proliferation and migration of vascular endothelial cells occurred in the moxibustion group. Yu32 also investigated attenuated metabolites of the TCA cycle and fatty acid metabolism after moxibustion.
4. Discussion
4.1. Summary of the main findings
The outcomes of this SR verified the efficacy of moxibustion in the treatment of cognitive impairment. Moxibustion treatment significantly improved the results of the behavioral test, the primary outcomes; it also showed efficacy against neurodegenerative disorders as shown through the outcomes of the immunohistochemical biomarkers, the secondary outcomes. These effects include attenuated acetylcholine (ACh) deficit and mitochondrial oxidative stress, attenuated inflammation and APP secretion, enhanced vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) activity and proliferation of vascular endothelial cells, and modulation of metabolites of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and fatty acid metabolism.
4.2. Overall completeness and applicability of the evidence
4.2.1. Suppressing ACh deficits and mitochondrial oxidative stress
The accumulation of Aβ1–42 has been reported to ACh deficit48 related oxidative stress,49 which leads to metabolic malfunctions in the brain.50,51 Liu et al33 reported the upregulation of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and GSH-Px and downregulation of AChE in the moxibustion group, suggesting that moxibustion could treat cognition loss by attenuating ACh deficits and mitochondrial oxidative stress.
4.2.2. Controlling APP secretase and Aβ genesis
Since Aβ is generated from β-secretase, including BACE-1 or γ-secretase composed of PS1 or PS2,52,53 inhibiting γ- or β-secretase has been targeted for AD treatment.54 Zhu et al30 reported the downregulation of PS1 and BACE-1 after moxibustion treatment, indicating the effect of moxibustion in preventing Aβ genesis and other five studies also demonstrated reduced Aβ formation 26,28,30,33,55 by moxibustion treatment.
4.2.3. Attenuating apoptosis
Accumulated Aβ in AD and ischemia in VD are considered to induce massive neuronal apoptosis.56,57 In response to apoptotic signals, overexpressed Bax promotes cell death by antagonizing the Bcl-2 complex.58 Two studies7,27 indicated the apoptosis-suppressive effect of moxibustion by demonstrating modulated Bcl-2 and Bax in the moxibustion group. Further, Weilan et al38 reported the downregulation of C-fos protein and, two other studies26,29 demonstrated the mitigated apoptotic morphology of cells after moxibustion treatment.
4.2.4. Regulating inflammation
In response to neuronal toxicity, activated microglia and astrocytes lead to increased levels of GFAP,59,60 which is correlated with NFTs,61,62 cytokines such as interleukin (IL) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α),63 and pro-inflammatory proteins such as nuclear factor κB (NF-κb). IL-1β is genetically correlated with a high risk of AD,64 IL-6 is elevated shortly after ischemic events, while IL-2 reduces amyloid plaque load.65
Jiang et al31 proposed that moxibustion alleviated neuroinflammation based on findings of decreased IL-1β and increased IL-2 levels, which were consistent with the findings of Zhu et al,30 Liu et al,33 and Zhu et al39 regarding attenuated pro-inflammatory factors after moxibustion treatment.30,66
4.2.6. Modulating metabolites of TCA cycle and fatty acid metabolism
Deficits in mitochondrial enzymes of the TCA are related to clinical disability in AD67; meanwhile lipid metabolism malfunction can contribute to the pathogenesis68 of brain injuries and neuropsychiatric disorders.69 Yu32 observed that moxibustion increases the levels of metabolic products of the TCA cycle and fatty acid metabolism.
4.2.7. Activating the VEGF
In response to ischemia,70 the angiogenic factor VEGF induces neuroprotective effects.71 Therefore, decreased levels of VEGF cause chronic ischemia of neurons.71 Three studies demonstrated that moxibustion treatment ameliorated ischemia-driven memory loss by improving levels of VEGF and basic fibroblast growth factor and its receptor. In addition, Zhang et al36 reported the improved proliferation and migration of endothelial cells in moxibustion-treated VD rats (Fig. 4).
4.3. Potential biases in the review process
There are several limitations inducing potential biases in the review process. First, the low reporting quality reduced the credibility of the study results. Ambiguity in the model selection and outcome assessment presents a high risk of assessment bias, and insufficient reporting of excluded animals may indicate a high risk of reporting bias. Second, insufficient between-group baseline adjustments and differences in the therapeutic protocol could potentially distort the results, causing high heterogeneity between studies. Third, the obtained results were insufficient to allow generalized conclusions regarding every possible cognitive impairment condition. The small number of included studies and different reporting formats impeded the analysis of some studies, and the included animal models do not encompass all possible cognitive impairment cases.
4.4. Comparison to previous reviews and implications
Compared to our previous SR22 investigating the efficacy of moxibustion in preventing cognitive impairment, this study is more focused on the therapeutic effects of moxibustion. In both SRs, moxibustion treatment improved the behavioral test scores, and suppression of apoptosis and inflammation appeared to be the common mechanism induced by moxibustion. In preventive research, increased activity of neurotrophins, heat shock protein, and modulation of the cell cycle were demonstrated to be mediated by moxibustion; meanwhile, this study suggests modulation of metabolites and mitochondrial oxidative stress as the therapeutic mechanism of moxibustion.
4.5. Implication for clinical trials
In previous clinical studies, moxibustion treatment groups showed increased clinical scores accompanying attenuated metabolic factors including lower blood cholesterol levels,72 suppressed oxidative stress,17 and regulated balance between plasma thromboxane B2 and 6-keto-PG1α.73 These findings have a part in common with the results of the present animal SR analysis. However, there is limited direct connection. The animal model design is inherently limited in terms of interpretation and application of human pathology. Unclear understanding of the pathology of human cognitive impairment makes it difficult to implement the results from an animal model in the treatment of humans.74
Despite the limitations, animal research has played a pivotal role in understanding the biological mechanisms of cognitive diseases and evaluating the efficacy of the drugs.75 Although designing an ideal animal study and implementing a clinical study is challenging, interpreting research using various models and improved evaluation methods might be helpful in overcoming the limitations of biased analyses.
4.6. Conclusions
This SR showed that moxibustion might be beneficial in treating cognitive impairment. Its mechanism might encompass the suppression of oxidative stress and apoptosis, modulation of inflammation and Aβ genesis, enhancement of VEGF activity, and adjustment of metabolites of the TCA cycle and fatty acid metabolism. However, there were several limitations of this review, including the small number of included studies that lacked a common study design. Furthermore, the low reporting quality induced a high risk of bias and impeded the validation of the findings. More specific and rigorous trials with large sample sizes are needed to validate the efficacy of moxibustion for cognitive impairment and thoroughly examine the underlying mechanisms.